Search REXPN

  • PDF File 15_2014_NCLEXExamStats_vol64.pdf

    Site: ncsbn.org

    -Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination by Degree Type (Oct. 1 – Dec. 31, 2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Table 7. First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination by Degree Type (Jan. 1 – Dec. 31, 2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Table 8. First-Time, Internationally Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination by Country of Education (Jan. 1 – Dec. 31, 2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Table 9. Candidates Taking the NCLEX-PN® Examination by Type of Candidate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Table 10.

  • PDF File NCSBN_AnnualReport2009_Apr10.3.pdf

    Site: ncsbn.org

    NCSBN FY09 THE YEAR IN REVIEW 15 16 NCSBN OPERATING STATEMENTS FY09 OPERATING STATEMENTS YEAR ENDED SEPT. 30, 2009 SOURCES OF REVENUE $ % Examination fees $60,650,700 87% Investment earnings $2,929,361 4% Membership fees $181,500 <1% Other program services $5,583,909 9% TOTAL $69,345,470 100% PROGRAM SERVICES $ % Nurse competency $36,320,749 71% Nurse practice and regulatory outcome $5,085,136 10% Information $7,070,994 14% Management and general $2,957,949 5% TOTAL $51,434,828 100% TOTAL INCREA ...

  • PDF File untitled

    Site: ncsbn.org

    Representativeness of Responders by NCSBN Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Newly Licensed LPN/VN LPN/VN Educator LPN/VN Supervisor Sample Responder Sample Responder Sample Responder N % N % N % N % N % N % Illinois 61 2.85 23 4.21 66 3.20 25 3.00 43 2.15 4 1.36 Indiana 49 2.29 8 1.47 48 2.30 20 2.40 61 3.04 7 2.38 Iowa 37 1.73 7 1.28 27 1.30 17 2.10 13 0.65 2 0.68 Kansas 27 1.26 4 0.73 21 1.00 12 1.50 10 0.50 0 0.00 Kentucky 39 1.82 9 1.65 24 1.20 6 0.70 37 1.85 4 1.36 Louisiana 58 2.71 7 1.28 54 2.60 ...

  • PDF File 2017_FSMB_Guidelines.pdf

    Site: ncsbn.org

    Western Journal of Medicine. 1990;152(5):613-616. 11. Parran TV Jr., Wilford BB & DuPont RL. Prescription drug abuse and addiction, Part II: Patient management. Up-to-Date online medical education website [www.uptodate.com]. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2012. 18 12. Blumenschein K, Fink JL, Freeman PR et al., for the Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting Program (KASPER) Evaluation Team. Review of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs in the United States.

  • Locked PDF File 2021DCM_kbenton.pdf

    Site: ncsbn.org

    THE NEED • Complexity of contemporary nursing practice • Nursing practice breakdown (NPB) - any disruption of safe practice • Recidivism – recurrent licensure discipline subsequent to order completion • Just Culture BACKGROUND • Mandated remediation may be effective in preventing recidivism of NPB in Texas RNs. (Hester, Green, Thomas, & Benton, 2011) • Individualized remediation may be effective in nursing and medicine. (Lillis, Takai, & Francis, 2014; Witmer & Rosborough, 2013) • Recidivism rat ...

  • Locked PDF File 2025nclex_jbetts.pdf

    Site: ncsbn.org

    NCLEX Exams Updates Joe Betts, PhD, Ed.S., MMIS Director, Measurement & Testing Exams Department, NCSBN Objective • Updated online reporting • Provide exam information update from last year’s conference Updated Pass Rate & Fact Sheet Website https://www.ncsbn.org/exams/exam-statistics-and-publications.page Updated Pass Rate & Fact Sheet Website • Interactive dashboard • Provides 10 years of historical statistics • NEW: weekly updated statistics for the current quarter NCLEX Results Overview • Since new exam design with polytomous scoring & clinical judgement • No significant delivery related issues – Hooray!!

  • PDF File MBPResponses

    Site: ncsbn.org

    (Check  all that apply) Responses Jurisdictions Number of Boards Percentage of Boards Responding Nurse anesthetist new license/recognition AK, AR, AZ, FL, GA, GU, IA, ID, KS, KY, LA-RN, MA, MD, MN, MS, ND, NH, NM, OH, OR, UT, VI, VT, WA, WY 25 49% Nurse anesthetist license/recognition by endorsement AK, AR, AZ, GU, KS, KY, LA-RN, MD, MS, ND, NH, NM, OH, OR, UT, VI, VT, WA, WY 19 37% Nurse midwife new license/recognition AK, AR, AZ, CA-RN, FL, GA, GU, IA, ID, KS, KY, LA-RN, MA, MD, MN, MS, ND, NH ...

  • PDF File MBPResponses

    Site: ncsbn.org

    Are there specific references to telenursing, telehealth or other terms referring to electronic practice in any of the following? (Check all that apply): Responses Jurisdictions Number of Boards Percentage of Boards Responding Nurse Practice Act AK, AR, CA-RN, DE, HI, ID, KY, ME, MI, MO, NV, OK, SC, TN, WV-PN 15 26% Rules and Regulations AL, AR, CT, DC, DE, FL, IN, KY, MA, MO, NV, OK, TX, UT, WV-PN 15 26% Declaratory rulings/advisory opinions AK, KY, LA-RN, MA, NH, NV, WA, WY 8 ...

  • Locked PDF File 2024dcm_mspector.pdf

    Site: ncsbn.org

    Too Much Information! Use of a Nursing Professional’s Social Media in Regulation Applicants Being Born Social Media is Fair Game, say Law Students 54% Denied for Social Media Posts 26% of Medical Students Unprofessional Otion Gjini Law Student Appearing in Playboy “Class of DDS 2015 Gentlemen” #MedBikini Carolyn Strom, R.N. “Cannot Find Signal in the Noise” “I think we are fighting a losing game” Have a policy Publish it Make sure it considers all the possibilities State what information will not be considered Make sure you have the resources to do it properly If you go for it, do it right

  • PDF File 14_2012_2013_NCLEXExamStats_vol61_updated.pdf

    Site: ncsbn.org

    Boards of Nursing and their Licensing Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table 16. Number of Newly Licensed RNs by Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table 17. Number of Newly Licensed LPN/VNs by Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Table 18. Total Number of Active Licenses: RNs and LPN/VNs, by Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Table 19. Total Number of New and Active Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Table 20.